Tags
The MSM Infotainment Complex is the Alabama Sister-Wife relationship of corporatocracy.

It’s not very hard to figure out who controls these evil bubbles and why they keep pushing the same Satanic agenda. Turn off. Tune off. Drop them.
08 Monday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on Incest in the Mass Media
Tags
The MSM Infotainment Complex is the Alabama Sister-Wife relationship of corporatocracy.

It’s not very hard to figure out who controls these evil bubbles and why they keep pushing the same Satanic agenda. Turn off. Tune off. Drop them.
08 Monday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on God Save The Queen!
Thank Heaven that Britain has a strong monarch in Her Majesty, Elizabeth (Alexandra Mary) the Second, of the House of Windsor, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, and Defender of the Faith. I for one was very worried that Meghan and Harry’s baby was going to go vegan on us.
With Her Majesty, 92, well-known for her love of hunting – it’s been the palace’s prized sport for hundreds of years – bringing up a child in the Windsor household who eats only plant-based foods really goes against the royal grain.
“The Queen won’t have it,” a source tells Woman’s Day.
“It’s created tense discussions between Meghan and Harry, who doesn’t want to upset his grandmother.
“He’s hoping Meghan will settle once the baby comes and he’s putting this latest polarising idea down to heightened emotions while being pregnant.”
So glad that’s settled. This matter was much more pressing than, say, trivial issues like Brexit, the ongoing invasion and conquest, and the literal conversion of Great Britain into Airstrip One. Good job, Jerry Jane.
08 Monday Apr 2019
Posted in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on Moral Duty and The Great Charter
Tags
In this sense, they don’t go together.
Last week, Mr Zuckerberg told politicians in Ireland that the company would work with governments to establish new policies in a bid to regulate social media.
The Home Secretary, Sajid Javid added that tech firms had a “moral duty” to protect the young people they “profit from”.
“Despite our repeated calls to action, harmful and illegal content – including child abuse and terrorism – is still too readily available online,” he said.
“That is why we are forcing these firms to clean up their act once and for all. I made it my mission to protect our young people – and we are now delivering on that promise.”
A 12-week consultation of the proposals will now take place before the Government will publish its final proposals for legislation.
The Government said the proposed regulator would have a legal duty to pay due regard to innovation, as well as to protect users’ rights online.
Social networks have failed to prioritise children’s safety and left them exposed to grooming, abuse, and harmful content
Peter Wanless, NSPCC
Peter Wanless, chief executive of children’s charity the NSPCC – which publicly backed the idea regulation in February, said the proposals would make the UK a “world pioneer” in protecting children online.
“For too long social networks have failed to prioritise children’s safety and left them exposed to grooming, abuse, and harmful content,” he said.
“So it’s high time they were forced to act through this legally binding duty to protect children, backed up with hefty punishments if they fail to do so.
“We are pleased that the Government has listened to the NSPCC’s detailed proposals and we are grateful to all those who supported our campaign.”
However, former culture secretary John Whittingdale warned minister risked dragging people into a “draconian censorship regime” in their attempts to regulate internet firms.
Writing in the Mail on Sunday, he said he feared the plans could “give succour to Britain’s enemies”, giving them an excuse to further censor their own people.
“Countries such as China, Russia and North Korea, which allow no political dissent and deny their people freedom of speech, are also keen to impose censorship online, just as they already do on traditional media,” he said.
“This mooted new UK regulator must not give the despots an excuse to claim that they are simply following an example set by Britain, where civil liberties were first entrenched in Magna Carta 800 years ago,” he said.
FB outrage of the day (again, told ya so) and woe unto GB.
07 Sunday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on Americans Are Addicted to Social Idiocy
Tags
A new poll indicates that Farcebook, Twitbook, and other social media operations are every bit as hypnotic and mind-altering and dangerous as television. People know there’s a problem but they can’t break the habit.
The American public holds negative views of social-media giants like Facebook and Twitter, with sizable majorities saying these sites do more to divide the country than unite it and spread falsehoods rather than news, according to results from the latest national NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
What’s more, six in 10 Americans say they don’t trust Facebook at all to protect their personal information, the poll finds.
There’s more.
According to the poll, 57 percent of Americans say they agree with the statement that social media sites like Facebook and Twitter do more to divide the country, while 35 percent think they do more to bring the nation together.
Fifty-five percent believe social media does more to spread lies and falsehoods, versus 31 percent who say it does more to spread news and information.
Sixty-one percent think social media does more to spread unfair attacks and rumors against public figures and corporations, compared with 32 percent who say it does more to hold those public figures and corporations accountable.
And a whopping 82 percent say social media sites do more to waste people’s time, versus 15 percent who say they do more to use Americans’ time well.
Wait for it.
But those numbers also come as nearly seven in 10 Americans — 69 percent — say they use social media at least once a day.
They don’t trust it. They know it’s not good for them. But they use it anyway. I can quit anytime I want! There’s more still.
The NBC/WSJ poll also finds Americans are down on Facebook, with 60 percent saying they don’t trust the company at all to protect personal information.
…
By contrast, the percentage of Americans not trusting companies or institutions with their personal information is lower for Amazon (28 percent), Google (37 percent) and the federal government (35 percent).
And by a 74 percent-to-23 percent margin, respondents say that social media companies collecting users’ personal data to allow advertisers to target them is not an acceptable tradeoff for free or lower-cost services.
Overall, 36 percent of adults view Facebook positively, while 33 percent see it negatively. And Twitter’s rating is 24 percent positive, 27 percent negative.
The people are twice as trusting of government as they are of Faceberg, while still taking copious advantage of the “benefits” of both. A slight majority say there’s no need to trust-bust the social tech monopolies. One frequent argument against that drastic action is that the socials are private companies ergo, leave them alone (to be evil).
Dear Libertarians, Whig Partiers, Tide Pod-eaters, and others: Farcebook is a corporation. Corporations are government-sanctified entities or fake persons. Government, on the other hand, is Faceberg with a gun.
And. What’s the great benefit to all the gibberish and stupidity of the socials? Does everyone search daily for long-form articles to read? No. Do they make use of the astounding research capabilities of the digital age? No. Self-improvement? No. It’s all cat videos, memes, pictures (of your kids…), echo chambering, cat videos, porn, gambling, and triviality. A giant, all-seeing, privacy-risking, literally mind-numbing (I mean literally a digital narcotic) waste of time.
Delete the accounts.
A suggestion for the neurological sciences-minded or professionals: conduct a brain scan study to map the effects, live or long-term, of social media usage. Maybe try t track who is and who isn’t more susceptible to harm. Write a paper. Win a prize. Give me credit. We’ll Tweet about it.
05 Friday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on Priced Out
Numbers don’t lie. Politicians and economists do.
There (before the last housing bubble) was this rule of thumb: hypothetical folks could afford (via debt instruments) a house costing approximately three times their annual income. Applying that rule in 2019 works like this: $63,000 per year income X 3 = $189,000 home price (with zero down and no costs, etc.). The $63,000 is the average American household income. Therefore, through the magic of usurious multiplication, the average American family should be able to purchase a $189K home.
It doesn’t work out quite that way sometimes. Other debts and expenses eat away at the equation. But, by the old rule, and with a little money down (or some extra financial tricks), Ma and Pa ‘Murica should hypothetically be able to buy the average All-American home for around $200,000. Except, they can’t do that.
Even if all the tricks are in play, it all falls apart because the average US house now sells for $300,000.
The median asking price for a U.S. home hit $300,000 for the first time ever in March, according to housing data from Realtor.com to be released later Thursday and provided early to USA TODAY. That topped the previous peak of $299,000 reached in June and July of last year.
Is there a new 5X rule? It would fit with the new average waistline anyway. But, no. People are just being priced out of the average. That’s now, during the boom to end all booms. If and when prices fall, look for incomes to do the same.
We definitely need more foreign wage competitors in the USE. More financialization too. More politicians and economists.
05 Friday Apr 2019
Posted in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes
Tags
child abuse, England, Facebook, Nigeria, regulation, slavery
All you Facebook child picture-posting attention whores are leaving money on the digital table. Who knew, but a photo or two of a (Nigerian) daughter can be worth $10,000, 3 Land Cruisers, and some cows.
OBANLIKU, Nigeria—Monica, 16, is one of two sisters sold as wives to men who found their photographs on their father’s Facebook page and contacted him. She and her 14-year-old younger sister never wanted to get married until they completed their secondary education in Ogbakoko, a small village in Obanliku Local Government Area in Nigeria’s south-central Cross River state. But the teenage sisters fell victims to a culture which subjects little girls, some as young as 10, to de facto slavery through a tradition called “money marriage.”
The sisters belong to the Becheve community, a large tribe of 17 villages in Obanliku where there is a long tradition in which young girls—often referred to as “money women” or “money wives”—are sold in exchange for food or livestock or cash, or to settle debts.
…
Spokespeople for Facebook, when contacted by The Daily Beast, were not familiar with the phenomenon as practiced in the Becheve community.
In other cultures where brides have been auctioned online, measures have been taken to stop the transactions.
Reports of Facebook being used as a tool to facilitate child marriage aren’t unique to Nigeria. Last November, the social media platform came under fire after posts discussing the sale of a 16-year-old girl in South Sudan. The victim was married in the process after her father, in exchange for his daughter, received 530 cows, three Land Cruiser V8 cars and $10,000. The teenager reportedly was bid on by five men, including senior officials in the South Sudanese government.
Best of all, with Farcebook serving as the broker, there’s no need for annoying calls or emails from “the Prince.”
I, for one, am deeply ashamed of Suckerberg for taking the ad down once it was brought to his people’s attention. That was a slap in the face to an age-old vibrant and diverse cultural tradition. Think of the tasty ethnic food. They could use this in Nashville.
Elsewhere, the Brits are crafting some of Zuckerborg’s regulations:
In a joint foreword, the home secretary, Sajid Javid, and the secretary of state for culture, media and sport, Jeremy Wright, say it is time to move beyond self-regulation and set clear standards, backed up by enforcement powers.
Companies will be asked to comply with a code of practice, setting out what steps they are taking to ensure that they meet the duty of care – including by designing products and platforms to make them safer, and pointing users who have suffered harm towards support.
The code of practice is also likely to include the steps companies will be expected to take to combat disinformation, including by using fact-checking services, particularly during election periods, and improving the transparency of political advertising.
Regulated firms will be expected to comply with the code of practice – or explain what other steps they are taking to meet the duty of care. However, many questions are left to the regulator to determine.
Theresa May has repeatedly raised the issue of online harm, and the government has gradually shifted its position, from favouring voluntary self-regulation to backing tougher enforcement.
This won’t bother Zuck. It won’t harm any backward future “refugees” and proposition “citizens.” It will be aimed at you. Censorship, taxes, maybe a social media user’s license – all possible. Then, sometime after they discover all the pictures you weren’t paid to post, your children may sue you for violating their privacy.
Delete your Facebook accounts today.
04 Thursday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on The Daily (Hourly?) Farcebook Outrage
Again, that fun and FREE! social media thingy really isn’t either.
540 million Facebook user records compromised.
Researchers at the cybersecurity firm UpGuard on Wednesday said they had discovered the existence of two datasets together containing the personal data of hundreds of millions of Facebook users. Both were left publicly accessible.
In a blog post, UpGuard connected one of the leaky databases to a Mexico-based media company called Cultura Colectiva. The data set reportedly contains over 146 GB of data, which amounts to over 540 million Facebook user records, including comments, likes, reactions, account names, Facebook user IDs, and more.
Knowing what we know about Mr. Suckerberg, how likely is it that this data was custom picked and then sold? I’d say more likely than not.
Yet and still … people are on FB. The Headmaster over at TPC just admitted he’s thinking about “life after Facebook.” And, he’s a forward thinker of the bigger thoughts. I’m starting to think about life after the internet. In my dreams, I begin to envision life after electricity. Pleasant dreams too. It beats the reality of having your life show up on the auction block in Mexico.
Get. Out. Now.
02 Tuesday Apr 2019
Posted in News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on Ruining a Nation
01 Monday Apr 2019
Posted in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes
≈ Comments Off on The Real Shame
Read what Philip Salzman and Paul Craig Roberts have to say about what passes for America and her colleges.
Universities in the 20th century were dedicated to the advancement of knowledge. Scholarship and research were pursued, and diverse opinions were exchanged and argued in the “marketplace of ideas.”
This is no longer the case. Particularly in the social sciences, humanities, education, social work, and law, a single political ideology has replaced scholarship and research, because the ideology presents fixed answers to all questions. And, although the most important thing in universities today is the diversity of race, gender, sexual practice, ethnicity, economic class, and physical and mental capability, there is no longer diversity of opinion. Only those committed to the ideology are admitted to academic staff or administration.
Universities have been transformed by the near-universal adoption of three interrelated theories: postmodernism, postcolonialism, and social justice. These theories and their implications will be explored here.
There Is No Truth; Nothing Is Good or Bad
The great shame is that most of the students do not know and do not care. Neither do their idiot parents. Neither do other idiots. Maybe they should.
Add in the second- and third-generation migrants, and you’re looking at around 85 million foreigners in a population of 310 million. That’s why I said, on a recent Darkstream, that the level of violence that can be reasonably anticipated in a US-breakdown scenario is Cultural Revolution-magnitude, which would indicate fatalities in the 50M to 100M range.
That’s Vox Day’s assessment. I was thinking 50 – 80 million. Another shame is that, again, nearly none care. (The greatest shame may be that 80 – 100M is too few).
31 Sunday Mar 2019
Posted in News and Notes, The Perrin Lovett Show
≈ Comments Off on 2019 Venezuela Update VIDEO
Yes, a new YT vid on an older and popular topic. Enjoy:
You must be logged in to post a comment.