• About
  • Blog (Ext.)
  • BOOKS
    • AURELIUS
    • GET OUT!
    • JUDGING ATHENA
    • Perrin On Politics
    • SOLD OUT
    • The Happy Little Cigar Book
    • THE SUBSTITUTE
  • Contact
  • Education Resources
  • News Links

PERRIN LOVETT

~ Deo Vindice

PERRIN LOVETT

Category Archives: News and Notes

Updates, new commentary, announcements, and more. Enjoy!

Rise of the Machines: The Dallas Bomb-Bot

08 Friday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Rise of the Machines: The Dallas Bomb-Bot

Tags

bombing, crime, freedom, government, law, people, police, robots

I hate to say none of the tragedy out of Dallas yesterday surprised me but it did not. Almost none of it. The murders of the police were predictable. The government is out of control. The people, some awake, some asleep, some sleep-walking, don’t have much control themselves. It’s a bad mixture. It could be much worse though it’s bad enough as is.

What did surprise me, slightly, was how the police killed shooter Micah Johnson. There was a long standoff and shootout. Unable to get a clear shot at him as he hid in a parking garage, the police used a robot to get a bomb close to Johnson. They detonated it, killing him and ending the situation. A robot. With a bomb.

This is not the first time American police (locals, not the feds) have bombed civilians. Here’s a video of a 1985 police bomb used in Philadelphia against a “radical” sect of black separatists. That bombing was roundly condemned as overkill – kill it did, eleven people I think.

The Dallas bombing yesterday was, if anything, more proportionate. The Philly bomb ended a days old siege which perhaps could have been waited out. In Dallas the police acted against an active shooter who posed an immediate threat. Their bomb only killed him.

Some are asking, “should the police be allowed to use bombs?” The short, legal answer is “yes”. I reluctantly concur with the expert consensus with qualification. The police, like anyone else, can legally kill anyone who poses an immediate threat of lethal or grievous danger. If they’re going to be killed, then does it matter if it is by bullet or by bomb?

I am not a fan of the modern, militarized police. Regardless of what I think, they are armed with military weapons. I will leave that angle alone for now. At any rate, in the old days, if the police could not handle a situation, they called in the state militia with heavy weapons – like bombs. And, I’m not going into due process issues either. I am assuming, for column’s sake, the justification for lethal force was there.

Another qualification I would add is that a destructive weapon, like a bomb, should only be used as a last resort and only if collateral damage is mitigated. It appears the damage mitigation box can be checked and I don’t have enough information on the last resort. I’ll give that benefit of the doubt to the police here.

Again, out of all of this it was the robot with the bomb that got my attention. The bomb was probably a Claymore mine or other anti-personnel device. In Philly, 1985, they used a powerful incendiary bomb. The robot used yesterday is more of a remote-controlled vehicle; it’s a machine, a tool. In 1985 they used a helicopter, another machine or tool.

The difference, as I see it, is the rapid advancements in robotics and artificial intelligence. Helicopters aren’t getting smarter, robots are.

The Dallas machine was 100% under operator control. However, other government agencies are spending a ton of your money to develop autonomous robots – machines that are programmed to act on their own. Industry is designing robots to control other robots.

Here we delve into science-fiction horror that is rapidly becoming reality. How long until there are autonomous robots with bombs or other weapons? What happens if they adapt to or against their programming and start acting completely on their own? What if they decide we, the humans, are the enemy? With the way technology is changing, we probably don’t have that long before we start getting answers.

I got this fictional Terminator picture from a story about the real thing.

If race relations are bad now, what about when (if, rather, I pray) it’s the human race versus the robots? They’re already taking our jobs. At some point could they see us as obsolete? Adversaries? We just might want to hypothesize these questions and possible answers before the machines do.

What is Wrong? Random Facts, Figures, and Opinions on Race, Violence, Government, and Some Other Stuff

08 Friday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on What is Wrong? Random Facts, Figures, and Opinions on Race, Violence, Government, and Some Other Stuff

Tags

America, banksters, civilization, crime, firearms, freedom, government, gun control, justice, peace, police, race, society, terrorism, The People, War

Historically, I experience a summer slow-down in blog views. It’s that time of year again. I’m also tired of late and working on other things. Yesterday, I took a great little mini vacation. I had a great time.

This morning, recovering, I looked at the news; it seems like the whole world is coming unglued. It isn’t, any more than usual, but it looks very bad. I don’t know if my following list provides perspective or not, but here it is.

Neither of these men needed to be or deserved to be gunned down.

There is no war on the police, per se, though there easily could be.

“Blowback” is a real thing.

There are 14 other occupations in America more lethally dangerous than being a police officer. Some are many times more dangerous. Logging is a dangerous job.

The cops are not out to murder blacks, per se, though it certainly seems like it.

The cops kill more whites every year than blacks. It’s the percentages and perceptions that drive BLM. You really can’t blame them, though…

Statistically speaking in terms of homicides, black people represent the largest danger to other black people.

A glance and a search around the internet will reveal more than a few whites being beaten, tazed, harassed, and killed by the cops – for nothing.

Still, white people are most dangerous to other white people.

There are criminals out there but most “crime” in America shouldn’t honestly be classified as such.

There are many bad apples in the barrel but many police officers are just plain people doing a job the best they can.

Too many people, of all colors, professions, etc., are killed all the time for essentially nothing. This should really end.

A murderer is a murderer, even if he wears a special costume and a badge.

It’s wrong to murder anyone, even if they’re wearing a badge.

America is a safer place now than it has been in decades. One wouldn’t think that given all the news of murders, hatred, and terrorism. It’s the speed of the reporting and all the camera phone.

The instant and constant reporting is new to human history.Maybe it’s a good thing, maybe it will help stamp out the last vestiges of violence and stupidity.

Different peoples are different. That’s why they’re different peoples.

Most people, despite being different, are really almost all the same on a day-to-day and individual to individual level. Most get along pretty well together.

Most individuals are, all in all, fairly decent.

Groups of people start having problems.

Many (maybe even a majority of) Americans, regardless of age, sex, race, income, geographical location, etc., have a really hard time properly operating a motor vehicle.

Those groups of individuals who, as groups, start to have problems, resort to government as a solution to their problems.

Government never has any solutions.

Government, once it takes hold, gains a life of its own, a life of dominance and control.

If the government can’t find a problem to not solve, it will create one. Or a hundred.

Certain little elite numbers of people and institutions traditionally seize on government power to further their own interests.

These elites are highly effective in plotting different people (or even similar people) against each other. This creates an atmosphere of fear and chaos which greatly assists the perception that more law may be the answer. It’s a self-sustaining machine, very expensive and very dangerous.

Many turn a blind eye to all of the above (unless it directly affects them) not because they are stupid, but because they would rather concentrate on the more pleasant, even trivial aspects of life. Understandable. Some are just stupid. Others are lazy. Again, the cameras and phones may help clarify or cure some of this.

“On the street” blacks and whites tend to look and behave mostly the same to me.

Many blacks and whites “on the street” irritate the hell out of me (if I let them).

I have a lot of friends, white and black. I’m rather fond of them.

There are other colors than black and white. The same rules generally apply to them as well.

For my own trivial pursuits, I like football. It’s getting really difficult to watch the average game; I keep waiting and waiting (usually until the end of the fourth quarter) for the football to break out of the otherwise ridiculous circus side-show.

A small group of bankers long ago discovered how to completely control government. Government long ago discovered how to completely control the people. Both groups have done a remarkably good job for themselves. Kudos to them (and damn them). All of this is mostly done in the open. Oddly, the people still haven’t figured it out. Shame on them (and hopes they will yet wake up).

Mencken wrote about imaginary hobgoblins. They still don’t exist for the most part. Some, however, have actually come to life. ISIS comes to mind.

Banning guns won’t help blacks, most cops, or anyone else. These things are just tools. It makes as little sense as banning chain saws to “help” loggers.

Gun bans don’t work. Neither to wars. That is unless by “work” one means “help the government become even stronger and more dangerous”. Then, they work great.

People like James Pearce and Gersh Kuntzman denounce and blame ordinary persons for committing imaginary crimes and for being “nuts” in the criminally, nutty manner possible. This isn’t a case of the pot calling the kettle black. This is a case of psychopathic lunatics trying to project their own illnesses onto the general population. What happened to the asylums?

This rant went on a little longer than I intended. I’ll stop it now.

How Government Really Works (For the Rich and Powerful)

06 Wednesday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on How Government Really Works (For the Rich and Powerful)

Tags

America, Bill Clinton, corruption, crime, freedom, government, law, Ron Paul

Many, many people are upset by Hillary’s most recent escape from justice. I’m not sure why they’re surprised. Injustice and a legal double standard are nothing new in post-American America.

Today John V. Walsh has some terrific satire on the matter, fictional (likely) but very close to the actual mark of corruption.

Bill (whispering): Loretta, they may have bugged your plane. Let’s use a simple code. I will call the FBI team working on the indictment, “your grandchildren.” And I will call Hill’s campaign “my second grandchild.”

Loretta nods in agreement and gives him a wink. They enter Lynch’s plane and sit down.

Bill: Nice to see you, Loretta.

You certainly have come a long way since I appointed you as a Federal Attorney way back in 1999. You deserve everything you have come by. I do not ever want you to feel indebted to me. And I am delighted that nothing embarrassing came up when you were confirmed as US Attorney General.

Loretta: Bill, you have not changed a bit.

Bill: I understand your grandchildren have been running wild these days. Are you still having trouble reining them in?

That is the way it is.

“W, the … the little people … still, … still believe in … justice! Ha, ha, ha, ha…”

There is a solution to this corruption. It’s a long process but the starting point is pretty easy. Just elect Ron Paul president in 2008. Oh, too late for that. Didn’t want to “throw away” the votes. Ah, then, just get used to it.

*Note: this is post 204 for the year, which surpasses all of 2015.*

Rise of the Machines: The Self-Crashing Car

06 Wednesday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Rise of the Machines: The Self-Crashing Car

Tags

America, cars, government, robots, stupidity, The People

Another week, another Tesla auto-pilot crash.

I’ve ranted before about just how bad American drivers are – they, the most of them, are horrible. Most of the nation’s roads have come under my own personal review. I drive extensively in the eastern and southeastern U.S. With the exception of the open expanses of the west and a few rural segments back east (and those usually at night) it is very bad out there and no fun anymore.

There’re different kinds of bad wherever one motors. In most big cities (LA, Atlanta, NYC, Miami, D.C., etc.) there’s fast and bad. Well, fast until a wreck completely stops traffic. In South Carolina, the whole state, it’s sloooooow and bad. Everywhere else it’s inattentive, careless, and bad. Sometimes a little malice is thrown in. Mindless zombies, who would quickly call for gun control, don’t mind at all careening around in the equivalent of a cruise missile while texting, eating, sleeping, vaping, talking, singing, rapping, screaming, grooming, and just about everything else imaginable (except driving).

My proposed solution is very, very simple. Most people, I’d like to think, are capable of properly operating a vehicle. All they have to do is DO it! Simple. Those who just can’t, and it’s a LARGE number, should not drive. Period. The auto industry, the insurance industry, and the malevolent forces of the state have another solution – self-driving cars.

Some day the technology will be proficient. Then, but not now, the systems will actually work. Of course, then they will be mandatory; no one, no matter how good behind the wheel, will not have the option to self drive. There won’t even be steering wheels anymore. That will afford the government incredible control over who goes where, when they go, how fast they go, and if they can go. That nightmare is still ten, twenty years down the road.

For now, more and more manufacturers are installing auto-drive systems, usually marketed under the ever-popular, yet ever-deceptive “safety” label. Take any of these systems and read about them in the manufacturer’s owner’s manual. To a one they all suggest the system is not a substitute for a competent driver, it may not work (at all, sometimes), and it is not fool-proof.

The fools don’t care. Safety.

More expensive models, like Tesla, come with a variety of auto-pilot features. They too have disclaimers no one reads. The idea is that they can pilot the car well unless something unexpected comes up. Unexpected, you know, like a semi or a guard rail, or something one would almost never see out on the road…

A Southfield art gallery owner told police his 2016 Tesla Model X was in Autopilot mode when it crashed and rolled over on the Pennsylvania Turnpike last week. The crash came just one day after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a report on a fatal crash in May involving a Tesla that was in self-driving mode.

 – Detroit Free Press.

The Tesla owner (not “driver” anymore) will still be cited by the police for the crash. How about that? You pay $100,000 for a government-subsidized robot car and it still crashes AND you get a ticket. I’ll bet the owner whines about this. I bet he sues Tesla or at least tries to raise them as a defense in traffic court. He bought for “safety” not for responsibility.

I don’t buy any of it. I now add robot cars to the list of those who just shouldn’t be on the roads at all. Until that day (ha!) I’m in the market for a new vehicle myself, something that will allow me to survive the increasingly dangerous roads of America and the stupid, incompetent drivers, something like this:

Google.

A Refuge From Refugees? Christians Need Not Apply

05 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

"Refugees", America, Christians, government, immigration, Obama, terrorism, The People

In honor of the June jihad, Hussein Obama admitted more than twice as many “refugees”to America in June as he did in May – 2,381 from Syria alone. Of that number, only eight were Christians – all the rest were Muslims with the exception of one who did not state a religion. That means the percentage of Christian refugees incoming in June was about .3%.

Something doesn’t add up. Assuming all these people are hapless, innocent victims of Washington’s proxy war in Syria, why wouldn’t there be a more even distribution of religions represented? Syria, according to Wikipedia, is nearly 8% Christian. That means 190 of the 2,381 should have been Christian – 8 percent not 8 numerically. Could it be someone doesn’t want Christians in a Christian country? Could it be ethnomasochism at work?

Now, let’s assume not all of these people are victims looking for help. 2,381 is a big enough number and we know the ranks are already skewed. What if some are coming to get revenge (and welfare) against America for its interventions in the Middle East? Or, just to commit crimes – like raping little girls in apartment complex laundry rooms.

These questions are on the minds of people in Rutland, Vermont, where residents are not so sure they want 100 of the new “refugees” in their town.

“To bring in 100 Syrians refugees is absolute lunacy,” [Dr. Timothy] Cook said. “They could be 100 people from Quebec and we’d still have to make accommodations for them, and it would fall to Rutland city taxpayers.”

“We’re not able to do it, and we’re not open to it,” said Cook, who helped found the opposition group Rutland First and says residents, not the mayor, should decide whether the Syrians come to town.

Rutland is small town America – about 16,000 residents. The new push is to settle “refugees” in smaller towns and cities, as the big cities have already become breeding grounds for crime and terrorism.

It’s the new Amerika. Better put some cameras in the laundry rooms.

Laws Are Like Spiders’ Webs

05 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

America, crime, FBI, government, Hillary Clinton, justice, law, laws

“These decrees of yours are no different from spiders’ webs. They’ll restrain anyone weak and insignificant who gets caught in them, but they’ll be torn to shreds by people with power and wealth.” – Anacharsis the Scythian (speaking with Solon).

So it is as it has always been. Today a woman with power and wealth once against tore to shreds American law. Hillary Clinton may have broken the law but she won’t be prosecuted according to the FBI’s recommendation issued today. The federal government has a law for everyone and everything – part of its scheme to maintain total control of the population, nothing more. People in charge of sensitive, classified information, like a Secretary of State, are expected to go above and beyond to maintain the integrity of the information entrusted to them.

Accordingly, the law places on such special people a higher standard of what is criminal misconduct. Congress eliminated the intent element regarding data transfers and breaches so that even incidents of negligence will qualify as offensive. In most circumstances a person accused of a crime must be proven to have intended to break a law or cause harm. They cannot or should not be charged if they did something accidental that resulted in a technical violation. In these special cases though the law is much more demanding. The information trustee is presumed to have the need and ability to protect the data even against foreseeable instances of negligence or even accidental unauthorized dissemination.

Hillary laughs at the weak and insignificant. Pinterest.

Today the FBI rewrote the law in order to avoid charging Hillary.

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.

  • National Review.

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is information that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,” [FBI Director] Comey told reporters in Washington, D.C., noting that the probe has found that the former secretary of state used several different email servers and numerous devices during her time in office.

  •  Politico.

The final say rests with the Department of Justice [SIC], parent of the FBI, which is under the control of Loretta Lynch (talk’n golf with President Clinton) and President Obama (Hillary’s boss and friend). Nothing will happen; case closed. On with the Democrat Party selection process and the general election. Even without criminal charges, do you want a President with a history of being “extremely careless” with classified information?

In any other investigation, right now an FBI agent would be applying before a judge for an arrest warrant. Anyone else would go to jail, go to trial, almost certainly be convicted of this crime, and probably do prison time. Well, anyone weak and insignificant would. Hillary is powerful, wealthy, special. Yesterday I put up a WSJ chart that shows (what I’ve talked about for years) that most people charged in federal court, who do not take a plea deal, end up convicted. And, almost all – the chart did not show this – almost all such persons enter into an agreement and plead guilty to something. Thus, those ensnared in federal prosecution (mostly for crimes the feds have no business prosecuting) are about 97-99% likely to be sentenced as guilty.

This is what we call a double standard. That’s what Anacharsis said to Solon 2,500+ years ago. It isn’t right. It isn’t justice. It is a clear sign that the real criminals are the agents of the state itself.

Homage to the Ancients: Afflictions and Inspirations

05 Tuesday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Homage to the Ancients: Afflictions and Inspirations

Tags

civilization, government, progress, savages, terrorism, The People, The West, War

Maybe I’ve spent too much time recently on the evils of Islamic terrorism (yes, ISIS struck again in Saudi Arabia at the end of Ramadan). It is what it is; and I see it as two ancient evils combining to wreak havoc. One the one hand, the terrorists themselves are desperately trying to carry on a 1,400 year-old war about a cousin and a brother-in-law or some such stupidity. On the other hand, the governments of the West are doing what governments have done since the institution was invented – meddling for power’s sake. Both of these traditions have gotten really old; one would think people would have had more than enough by now. They haven’t. There’s something about ancient traditions, even the bad ones, that keep us coming back.

Traditionally people the world over have lived in little tribes, marked by readily identifiable characteristics – geographical, ethnic, religious similarities. Frequently, the little tribes would war with their neighbors. These wars are often the basis for reported history, as if human beings have nothing better to do than to kill each other. I remember reading Jacques Barzun’s From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present some years ago and being surprised the old man didn’t concentrate exclusively on martial conflict throughout his sweeping narrative of the rise and todder of the modern West.

The end of the modern West (as we knew it) are interesting times. There seems to be a mad rush to intermingle many if not all of those little warring tribes together within the societies of modern, civilized nations. This could have never sounded like a good idea to the sane but there have been a multitude of reasons and excuses given for doing so. Lately, the organizers are dropping their pretexts – “we’re just doing it, damn it!” In fact, they seem to be on the cusp of revealing a dark, sinister truth behind their endeavors – the outright genocide of white, European peoples, maybe. Some are already shouting this but they are, as yet, radicals not confirmed by the mainline lunatics. None of this will end well.

Tribes imported from the third world are praised for their savagery towards the native hosts. Of course, it can’t be called savagery – that would be racist. Just praise them and let them loot, rape, kill, and burn at will. The natives are told they are inherently evil. It is implied that they deserve to be looted, raped, killed, and burned. But, that is not racist.

One could easily look at history for direction in the future and see a war brewing. A lot of the white folks are not buying their own extermination, just because. A lot of them are armed – many heavily. A lot of them are beginning to itch for a fight. Lest the fools forget, no one has ever done war like the West. Also, history shows over and over that this type of ethnomasochism has occurred before. It never ends that well for either side, especially for the invaders. If it comes to blows this time perhaps we should, after the canon smoke clears, take account of who initiated the pogrom …er… program. Perhaps those instigators deserve special retribution.

Yet, through all this, hope shines on – and is tied to other ancient traditions to boot.

Early this morning the West, despite all the inherent evils, celebrated another milestone of civilized progress. While lesser men blew themselves up and beheaded each other over “disrespect” and other bullsh!t, the Men of the West successfully orbited another spacecraft around the planet Jupiter.

Little Juno the science probe arrived at the fifth planet in the wee hours to begin a years-long mission to record magnetic, mass, gravitational, weather, and other information about the gas giant. I wrote another because the probe Galileo did a similar job over twenty years ago.

Juno will scan deep into the swirling clouds of Jupiter, tracking wind and weather phenomenon. Think of it as an interstellar political science project – observing the hot air and wind of a gas-bag. Therein lies the ancient connection: Jupiter (the Roman equivalent of the Greek god Zeus) was the king of the gods. To conceal his identity and motives he wore about him a cloak of clouds through which none could see. Except Juno, his wife (Hera), could see through the clouds; she alone could fathom Jupiter’s demeanor. Modern science imitates ancient art.

The moral of this story, great people, is that even as we fight off the hoards and hounds of Hades, we advance. There is great hope for the future.

Concept art (now reality) of Juno in orbit. NASA.

Sobering Thoughts on Independence

04 Monday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, Declaration of Independence, freedom, government, Paul Craig Roberts, The People, tyranny

Paul Craig Roberts offers up some incredibly poignant commentary on American freedom and independence, some of which dove-tails with my post earlier this morning:

On July 4th all across America, there will be patriotic speeches about our soldiers who gave their lives for their country. To an informed person, these speeches are curious. I am hard-pressed to think of any examples of our soldiers giving their lives for our country. US Marine General Smedley Butler had the same problem. He said that his Marines gave their lives for United Fruit Company’s control of Central America. “War is a racket,” said General Butler, pointing out that US participation in World War I produced 21,000 new American millionaires and billionaires.

When General Butler said “war is a racket,” he meant that war is a racket for a few people getting rich on the backs of millions of dead people. According to the article in the American Journal of Public Health, during the 20th century 190 million deaths could be directly and indirectly related to war.

…

In the United States, patriotism and militarism have become synonyms. This July 4th find the courage to remind the militarists that Independence Day celebrates the Declaration of Independence, not the American Empire. The Declaration of Independence was not only a declaration of independence from King George III but also a declaration of independence from unaccountable tyrannical government. The oath of office commits the US officeholder to the defense of the US Constitution from enemies ”foreign and domestic.”

In the 21st century, Americans’ worst enemies are not al Qaeda, Iran, Russia, and China. America’s worst enemies are our own presidents who have declared repeatedly that the orchestrated “war on terror” gives them the right to set aside the civil liberties guaranteed to every citizen by the US Constitution.

  • Paul Craig Roberts, LRC Archives, July 4, 2016.

His is a dual archive column of considerable length for a holiday read but well worth the effort. Today is a day for Americans to celebrate individuals standing up against government and tyranny (synonyms, really), not for standing up and cheering the government on.

freepik.com

Happy Independence Day!

04 Monday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in Legal/Political Columns, News and Notes

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

America, Declaration of Independence, England, freedom, government, King George III, revolution, The People

Every month has a fourth day. July is special because on that particular fourth day the Second Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence. The thirteen American colonies, already at war with Great Britain, declared themselves sovereign states and completely free from the Crown.

Thomas Jefferson, Timothy Matlack, et al, listed various offenses committed by King George III such to necessitate the war and declaration. I have noted a few of the major complaints against the King and included illustrative pictures for reference. Among the several accusations it was alleged the King:

Improperly governed by interrupting the due order of legislative authorities – (like this);

post-gazzette.com

Obstructed justice – (like this);

David Griffin

Sent government agents to harass and rob the people – (like this);

offthegridnews.com

Kept standing armies among the people in peace time so as to subjugate the civil authority to the martial – (like this);

infowars.com

Imposed taxes on the people – (like this);

defensetax.com

Deprived the people of jury trials – (like this); and

wsj.com

Imported armies of hostile foreigners – (like this).

stridentconservative.com

Funny there are so many examples today of problems thought solved 240 years ago.

Here is the entire text of the Declaration:

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

harrisongreetingcards.net

Amidst all the fireworks, cookouts, and state adulation, please take a moment to consider the reasons why the United States declared Independence from Great Britain. Ask yourselves if those values are worth reconsidering today.

Happy birthday, America!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fireworks

03 Sunday Jul 2016

Posted by perrinlovett in News and Notes

≈ Comments Off on Fireworks

Tags

bomb, Iraq, ISIS, New York, terrorism

Though the Bangladeshi government denies it, ISIS is has claimed responsibility for the Dhaka restaurant attack Friday. The Bangabhaban seems to think the terrorists were part of a local radical group. Having copied U.S. corporate styles, ISIS likes to outsource their work so it could have been both.

Today in Baghdad a truck bombing killed 115 people. That was undoubtedly the work of ISIS; it happened on their home turf. Are we all Iraqis now? Are we Baghdad strong? Do members of Congress plan a sit-in to draw attention to the need to ban trucks?

As these attacks happened far, far away from the blessed shores of Columbia, most Americans likely won’t pay them much notice. Too far from home in untrendy places.

How about New York City? It’s pretty close to home and, according to Madison Avenue, it’s the trendiest place on earth. This morning a young man lost a foot when he stepped on an explosive device. Some thought it was a bomb, others assumed it was a fireworks accident. The police don’t seem sure about either possibility. “‘The explosion could have been an experiment with fireworks or homemade explosives,’ said Counterterror Chief John O’Connell. ‘We do not have any evidence of a constructed device or commercial grade fireworks. We believe this could have been put here as some sort of experiment.'”

They didn’t find labels or other material to readily identify it as a product of Black Cat or General Dynamics so it’s some sort of experiment. Who conducts such experiments and why? Two groups come to mind – prankster a-holes and terrorists. Given the terror trend of late, I’d go with the latter group (though it is possible there are rogue prankster terrorists out there).

The bombs used in the Boston Marathon attacks were allegedly manufactured out of fireworks and pressure cookers – an experiment, if you will. The physical evidence there was rather lacking as were witnesses, who were either killed by the police or whisked away rapidly into someone’s custody. Still there is a precedent; it is possible to cook up a homemade device using fireworks or any of dozens of chemicals and materials available at Home Depot.

They are saying this incident or experiment looks like a freak accident. They also said WTC 7 had collapsed half an hour before it actually did.

We’ll see what tomorrow brings.

travelandleisure.com

 

 

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Perrin Lovett

AURELIUS COMING SOON
From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

From Green Altar Books, an imprint of Shotwell Publishing

Perrin Lovett at:

Perrin on Geopolitical Affairs:

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • June 2012

Prepper Post News Podcast by Freedom Prepper (sadly concluded, but still archived!)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Join 40 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • PERRIN LOVETT
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar